The World Thru My Eyes - I speak my mind and man does it like to talk.

As I wrote on my article Giving President Obama a chance; to break a promise Obama basically broke his promise of bring down pork spending to 1994 levels when he signed the Omnibus Spending bill. But Democrats can’t take all the blame for this shameful waste of money during a time when “fiscal responsibility”. as per Obama’s own words, should be this Administrations priority.

For those who think some of us here on JU only have one agenda, to criticize everything Obama and the Democrat related, here’s one I’m sure you gonna love and I expect you recognize we can point fingers to our own party when they too screw up.

According to an article on Yahoo! News (Link) 40% of the $7.6 Billion in pork spending found on the Omnibus Spending bill Obama was to sign this week came from Republican members.

Even Arizona Rep Jeff Flake (R) admitted to Hannity that this was true:

FLAKE: Believe me, some of — some of my colleagues and myself have been arguing this for years. It was devastating today when the Democrats were able to come out and say, "Well, Republicans have 40 percent of these earmarks," and it was true. And we really can't separate ourselves from the Democrats as long as we continue to do this. So I'm with you there. We just can't get our colleagues to do it.

Link

I’ll be one of the first to say that it’s a shame that our own Representatives would be so hypocritical as to add pork spending to this bill while criticizing Democrats for spending this country into socialism. Even if the Democrats had the bigger piece of the pork pie, that doesn’t excuse the Republicans for trying to get their own hands on money we should not be spending. Politics as usual have not stopped and President Obama is not making it any better by breaking his promises. This was his chance to not only keep his promise but to also deal a blow to the Republicans. Do the crime, do the time, it’s what I believe in and no one is exempt.


Comments
on Mar 03, 2009

Your article title is a little misleading: in this case, the republican representatives are engaging in pork spending as the democrats at 2/3s the magnitude. It'd be more accurate to say that they are 66% as hypocritical as the democrats.

on Mar 03, 2009

Your article title is a little misleading: in this case, the republican representatives are engaging in pork spending as the democrats at 2/3s the magnitude. It'd be more accurate to say that they are 66% as hypocritical as the democrats.

I guess I see what you mean. I tried to get the best title that made most sense and sounded sorta funny but came across a bit wrong. let me see if i can correct it.

on Mar 03, 2009

I don't know where you got your figures, the Republicans with their finger in the pie are 100% hypocritical on this. The Democrats are just doing what they normally do.

on Mar 03, 2009

Still misleading.

Ignoring independents and vacancies there are 254 democrats and 178 republicans in the house and 56 democrats and 41 republicans in the senate. Therefore (178+41)/(254+178+56+41) = 41% of congressmen are republicans. On a per capita basis there is no distinguishable difference between republican and democrat pork. 40% of congressmen are responsible for 40% of the pork and the remaining 60% of congresssmen are responsible for the other 60%.

It seems like both parties are equally "piggy" here.

on Mar 04, 2009

OK, you all are missing the point of the title. Did you even bother to read the story at all? 40% of the pork on the bill was by Republicans, hence 40% of the hypocrisy? People, I am not doing math here, I am simply making a catchy title. Get over the calculations and talk about the story itself. Lord have mercy.

Does no one have anything to say about the point of the story? So I guess we can give the Republicans a pass  on this too right? It seems 2 wrongs do a make a right, after all 2 negatives equal a positive when multiplying. Hows that for math?

on Mar 04, 2009

The point of the article can be summed up by paraphrasing Lewis Black, who said the main difference between our two parties is that one sucks and the other blows. Is that about right?