I wouldn't sell you a car I wouldn't drive myself, but Obama would.

Published on July 24, 2009 By CharlesCS In Current Events

I normally like writing a lot to make sure I make my point. This time a short article should be enough to make my point.

This Obamacare Healthcare Bill Obama and is some of the Democrats are so desperate to pass and in such a rush to the point Pelosi has the "legislative throttle at full-speed-ahead" (as Foxnews.com put it), if it is that good, if it's modeled around the "great" (debatable) Canadian and Brittish healthcare system, if this is such a great plan, why are Congress, Senate, Gov't employees and evn the President himself exempt from it? Why do they keep themselves from benefitting from this bill that the President is so passionate about and believes will be good for the rest of the country? Are Gov't employees not worthy of such a "great" system? How come when it comes to the rest of us private insurers are making too much profit and not providing quality healthcare service but Gov't employee's are allowed, not forced to use Obamacare?

So Mr President, would you buy the car for yourself or... a family member?

Comments

AldericJourdain

on Jul 24, 2009

I wouldn't sell you a car I wouldn't drive myself

Mm, want an '89 Chevy? Free for me, cheap for you. Only 2,000$

So Mr President, would you buy the car for yourself or... a family member?

I can't say that understand their logic or lack thereof.

CharlesCS

on Jul 24, 2009

Mm, want an '89 Chevy? Free for me, cheap for you. Only 2,000$

I'm looking for a 69' Camaro, of course I am also looking for the money needed to purchase the car.

I can't say that understand their logic or lack thereof.

What can you say? Give me something, besides an 89 Chevy.

AldericJourdain

on Jul 24, 2009

I'm looking for a 69' Camaro, of course I am also looking for the money needed to purchase the car.

Haha, arn't we all looking for money? lol A '69 isn't that bad in my opinion.

What can you say? Give me something, besides an 89 Chevy.

Hmm, I'll see if I know anyone that has a '69.

CharlesCS

on Jul 24, 2009

Hmm, I'll see if I know anyone that has a '69.

Well, I was looking more for an opinion than a 69', don't forget I still have to come up with the money too. Chances are I will get your opinion way before I get the money.

AldericJourdain

on Jul 24, 2009

Well, I was looking more for an opinion than a 69', don't forget I still have to come up with the money too. Chances are I will get your opinion way before I get the money.

Mmm, not so much my opinion as I just would look around for anyone that has one. If nothing else, they could help with an opinion.

Be well, ~Alderic

AldericJourdain

on Jul 24, 2009

I can't say that understand their logic or lack thereof.

Speaking of, there should be an I between that and understand.

taltamir

on Jul 24, 2009

I can't say that understand their logic or lack thereof.

Sure you do, you just don't want to admit they are that selfish and corrupt.

There was a proposed amendment to require all congressmen and their families to be on the government insurance. It did not pass.

mrboo

on Jul 25, 2009

Well the rules are always exempt for Government employees compared to normal Citizens in practicality eventhough not theoritcally.

CharlesCS

on Jul 25, 2009

Well the rules are always exempt for Government employees compared to normal Citizens in practicality eventhough not theoritcally.

I'm curious. Are Gov't employee's foreigners, legal (or ilegal) aliens, non-Americans? Otherwise, call them what you want, last I checked they too are normal Citizens.

taltamir

on Jul 25, 2009

his point was obviously that they are legal normal americans on paper, but in practice are treated like nobility.

And its specific levels of government, some like the majority of police and military are treated like crap.

AldericJourdain

on Jul 25, 2009

Sure you do, you just don't want to admit they are that selfish and corrupt.

It was sarcasm/tongue in cheek taltamir.

CharlesCS

on Jul 25, 2009

his point was obviously that they are legal normal americans on paper, but in practice are treated like nobility. And its specific levels of government, some like the majority of police and military are treated like crap.

That much I know, what I don't want is to accept the idea that a Gov't position makes someone better than me. Last I checked, again, they would not be there without us.

AldericJourdain

on Jul 25, 2009

his point was obviously that they are legal normal americans on paper, but in practice are treated like nobility.

That much I know, what I don't want is to accept the idea that a Gov't position makes someone better than me. Last I checked, again, they would not be there without us.

Last time I checked, we fought against those type of people in the.....oh what was it again...some war. Oh right, the american revolution. Hopefully it rings some bells...

taltamir

on Jul 25, 2009

That much I know, what I don't want is to accept the idea that a Gov't position makes someone better than me. Last I checked, again, they would not be there without us.

I don't understand... what is there not to accept?

it is obvious that they should NOT be nobility in this country, and yet it is obvious that they ARE treated special. Them and celebraties (resisting arrest, running from the police, drunk driving, going 90 on a 30, and throwing racial insults at a cop? mmm... yea I think some probation and therapy are in order...)

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!