I don't see it working. 

i would say If your Monitor and Graphics card can display 3D then and you have the right 3D glasses you can watch 3D now

you can even at this time with said stuff above

seen some websites in 3D

Nvidia-3D

If you are looking to purchase a new PC or upgrade your existing PC, 3D capability is a must have feature for anyone interested in gaming, photography, movies, multimedia applications, or web surfing.

I just need the 3D Glasses hope it's a Christmas Present 

Would you please elaborate? I would really like to hear why you don't think it will. 3D seems to be todays TV version of the iPhone where most can't really afford it, it's not absolutely necessary but people will get it anyways. It would only be natural that people will want to play with 3D video and youtube as well.

Actually, I do see it happening. With Kinect type technology... maybe not many doing it to begin with, but it'll get there.

http://youtu.be/Y-P1zZAcPuw

http://youtu.be/3seTlvQtIgc

That was in 2009.

Why do I say that, soley based upon my own feelings and opinion. 

3D is bascially 50's technology, yes there have been improvements made but not enough to bring it to the consumer at a prices that are affordable.  The movie industry is still trying to find a cheaper way to make and produce 3D media that will make it a mass appeal item.   No facts or figures to give you, just some reading on the subject. 

I think they need to spend the time and effort in developing the holodeck concept.  Now there is something that will be a break through.

     Actually holography isn't all that new either. Back in 02 when I worked st a clock factory I used to build my own circuit boards. I subscribed to a magazine called popular electronics. Each month they came out with a set of do it yourself circuits. One of them was building the video projector plus the support circuitry and bearing in mind that this was nine years ago the concept though primitive actually worked. It involved projecting the image on a cloud. It was a mist you created using dry ice. I tried it and I fried it. So much for that. 3D is very difficult to achieve without the use of glasses. It involves a central screen with twin projectors. One in front and one in back. Each projector has the three basic elements. RGB...red green and blue. The one stumbling block is depth. How to bring out the subject so that it looks 'real'. The best that has ever been achieved is the movie Pandora. CGI. Pixar and a few others have done it but it isn't true 3D. All their doing is taking 3D images and putting them on a 2D background. It has a way to go yet because the technology is very much in its infancy. Eventually it will happen  but not any time soon.

I'd think the only "true" 3D would involve hordes of tiny people, dogs, etc. dancing around in boxes of varying size.

I know I'm taking what you wrote to ridiculous extreme, Uvah...but for a purpose: It's all a scam. There is no true 3D. You just have varying degrees of success with the illusion of 3D.

http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/hiner/stop-being-duped-by-the-3d-scam/7983

I think I agree with them:

"The entertainment and electronics industries keep trying to push 3D on consumers, even though a lot of smart people have caught on to the fact that it’s a scam. It’s time to stop the madness."

Really.... It's nice, but it can wait. It's like "Oh, you gotta get this new thing!". No I don't. The old thing is working great for now. Go ahead and develop it at a sane pace. Look at it from all sides. Kick the tires. No need to rush headlong into it.

But it'll come. Have no doubts.

Ignore the current ver of 3D that requires glasses.

It really is old tech.

Next generation won't need glasses....

No problem Doc. That much is a given. And you're right when you say it'll come in time. The only 'true' 3D is what you see when you open your eyes every day. Creating that artificially.......nah. It would take an insane amount of money to design, manufacture, deploy and sync a myriad of mini projectors just to cover one scene. Imagine the cost if they had to cover multiple scenes, multiple angles and the many aspects of each. The variables are nearly infinite.

Ahhh, did this thread just get SPAMMED?

EDIT:  Looks like I'm alittle slow this morning.

Quick Draw McHank ... or Hank Scissor Hands.