The World Thru My Eyes - I speak my mind and man does it like to talk.

2009, a year where the Republicans became the minority in the Gov't and lost most of their power to keep balance in the Gov't, the GOP in Congress have shown still have a backbone and will not back down and bow down to he who believe's because he won that somehow his will shall be done.

Bush was criticized by many for approving the $700 billion stimulus package that was said to go against what the majority of Americans wanted. To this day the bill has done very little of what was said it would do. Our economy continues to go down, jobs continue to be lost and businesses are closing faster than the roadrunner can run; as oppose to going into complete metdown, the degredation of our economy was simply brought to a slow and more painful crawl.

Now President Obama and his Democratic majority in Congress have passed their first "obsticle" (if it can be called an obsticle) as the second bill for the $819 billion stimulus package goes to the Senate for approval, a bill that, again, goes against what most Americans want, except this time the Republicans chose to stand their ground as Obama tried to reel them in to be "bipartisan" in these preceedings. But, it would seem that while Obama continue to grill the Republicans for not being "bipartisan" with his ideals, some Democrats also voted against the new stimulus package. It would seem that not only does Obama not have the support of the Republicans in Congress but has lost (if ever had) the support of some of his own people.

I am glad the Republicans in Congress chose to stand their grounds on this new stimulus package as it has been shown to be anything but a stimulation to the economy. This bill goes agaisnt everything Obama said he would do; at a time when we should not be wasting money, the stimulus package is stuffed with many Democratic policies and plans that seem unnecessary at a time when we can not afford them. But I will be told by many that these things are needed and I will simply say "what ever you say" as I will have no choice but to sit back and watch as those benefits work for a little while, all the while reality begins to set in and many will realize that this bill did not do what it was promised it would. Why do I say this before we even see it in action? Simple, we already saw what the first stimulus package did, very little if anything and we can't even verify what the banks did with the money they were given not to mention now they want more, and we also have countries like Japan as testament of this kind of action that did not work.

I hope the Republicans in the Senate stand up to this bill as well, if we gonna pass some kind of stimulus package in the hopes to save our economy, we need to eliminate a lot of the crap that was put in this first installment of the 2009 bill. I am sadden that Obama has decided to decieve his voters by going agaisnt that which he promised but I am even sadder his followers are too blind to see the realities of this bill and instead will follow him faithfully like some kind of God or Prophet.

They say things will get worse before it gets better. Obama seems determine to prove this saying. And we are his lab-rats for the testing. God help us all.


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jan 30, 2009

copy the embed stuff, paste it in.

on Jan 30, 2009

i've seen no evidence that "most americans" oppose obama's stimulus plan.

Perhaps you should check the latest Rasmussen poll.  LINK

on Jan 30, 2009

Pot, meet kettle

Sucks the have the shoe on the other foot doesn't it? For 8 years Democrats bitched about everything now you dare to criticize us from doing the same? Hypocrisy at its finest

Two wrgnos dno't mkae a rhigt (except in mathematics!). Hypocrisy shouldn't be excused by anothers hypocrisy, and just goes to show that politicians are often as bad as each other.

on Jan 30, 2009

Hypocrisy is a given.  All you can do is decide for yourself who's hypocrisy is better for the country.

on Jan 30, 2009

Perhaps you should check the latest Rasmussen poll.

 

perhaps you should consider remedial 4th grade math.  39% opposed is hardly "most"

on Jan 31, 2009

i've seen no evidence that "most americans" oppose obama's stimulus plan.
Perhaps you should check the latest Rasmussen poll. LINK
perhaps you should consider remedial 4th grade math. 39% opposed is hardly "most"

You may have noticed that I did not agree or disagree with your "evidence" remark. I merely refereed you to a source (the article title "Public Support for Economic Recovery Plan Slips to 42%" down from 46%). The opposition to the bill is indeed 39% (and appears to be growing) while 19% don't know if it will help/hurt. The next few days will reveal any trends.

But like most of the left wing elitists on JU, that think they are being witty, or exercising their huge superior brains, the true level of intelligence I've come to know from them is somewhat different. I'll gladly re-mediate math if you'll get some help with reading comprehension (not to mention capitalization and punctuation). What a sad paranoid life you must live when you attack a person that is makes a suggestion to you. even if it supports your statement. To the rest sorry I had to highlight the contents of the link, I know most here are capable of reading for themselves. 

on Feb 01, 2009

I'll gladly re-mediate math if you'll get some help with reading comprehension

The implication of your post was that you were linking the article to refute kingbee. It may not have been the only interpretation of what you wrote, but it was the most obvious/likely.

sorry I had to highlight the contents of the link, I know most here are capable of reading for themselves

Actually I prefer it when the contents of a link are highlighted - as a rule I'm not that fond of going to external links, especially if I don't have much idea of their contents. It also would've helped to avoid any misinterpretation of what you were saying.

on Feb 01, 2009

copy the embed stuff, paste it in.

Thank you? Tried it but didnt work,or maybe I think it didnt.

on Feb 01, 2009

Two wrgnos dno't mkae a rhigt (except in mathematics!). Hypocrisy shouldn't be excused by anothers hypocrisy, and just goes to show that politicians are often as bad as each other.

It may not make a right but it is a right. Keep in mind the righ way isn t always the best way.

on Feb 01, 2009

The implication of your post was that you were linking the article to refute kingbee. It may not have been the only interpretation of what you wrote, but it was the most obvious/likely.

Fair enough (I have no control over your assumptions, if I disagreed I would have said directly), but perhaps asking for clarification of my statement (the linked article was clear enough i thought) prior to a personal attack would have been the appropriate course of action. When I see people doing exactly what they accuse former presidents of doing, it neither supports their position nor their credibility.

While the "stimulus" package currently has a slight lead in support (3%) it appears to be losing that lead. Now that it has moved to the senate I saw a news clip that even some democrats in the Senate don't believe it should be passed as is. Of course as more of the pork gets exposed to the public, this is bound to cause a few senators to re-evaluate their position on the bill.

That's not Rush Limbaugh, that's concerned citizens voicing their opinion to their representatives. That is how this should work, instead of the mid-night, closed doors push some were hoping this bill would get.

on Feb 01, 2009

Nitro... the current polls still show that the "stimulus" still has strong public support for it.. I think it was as high as 60+% yesturday. So dont let the smoke in mirrors fool you....

on Feb 02, 2009

Nitro... the current polls still show that the "stimulus" still has strong public support for it.. I think it was as high as 60+% yesturday. So dont let the smoke in mirrors fool you....

I took my info from the Rasmussen poll, because of their record of accuracy and non-bias. They had it at 46% then sliding down to 42%. If it had gone up this weekend, I did not hear about it. I suppose if changes were made support might increase, as even some Democrats were not happy with what the House sent up. What was your source?

Believe me I'm not fooled at all. I fully realize something is going to be passed. Based on recent history I don't support the money going to these banks and companies. They swallow it up and greedily ask for more, and worse nothing happens. So knowing that we are going to throw a big pile of money away anyway, at least some of the pork might get removed from the bill (like ACORN).

on Feb 02, 2009

at least some of the pork might get removed from the bill (like ACORN).

and since you're such a righteous non-paranoid, non-elitist objective thinker, you'll be able to respond by quoting all actual provisions of the obama stimulus bill which directly fund acorn.

on Feb 02, 2009

and since you're such a righteous non-paranoid, non-elitist objective thinker, you'll be able to respond by quoting all actual provisions of the obama stimulus bill which directly fund acorn.

You can start with the section titled "Community Planning and Development, Community Development Fund" beginning on page 220 of H.R. 1.  It's kind of long so a quote won't do it justice.  Lotsa zeros in the amounts allocated there, though.  'Course, it doesn't mention ACORN by name, but has eligibility bureaucratese that ensures ACORN is among the first in line at the trough.

on Feb 02, 2009

Daiwa

and since you're such a righteous non-paranoid, non-elitist objective thinker, you'll be able to respond by quoting all actual provisions of the obama stimulus bill which directly fund acorn.
You can start with the section titled "Community Planning and Development, Community Development Fund" beginning on page 220 of H.R. 1.  It's kind of long so a quote won't do it justice.  Lotsa zeros in the amounts allocated there, though.  'Course, it doesn't mention ACORN by name, but has eligibility bureaucratese that ensures ACORN is among the first in line at the trough.

 

LOL SNAP

 

thanks for reading all of that for me...that thing is what over 600 pages haha..

3 Pages1 2 3