Charles, is it just impossible for you to have a normal conversation. I stated more than once how I feel about censorship and this whiney article was all your doing, I know because you didn't ask me, waaa waaa waaa

Baaaaaap!  Wrong.  You cannot stay on topic, but expect everyone to read your mind and follow when you change.  Sorry, your attention span is that of a gold fish, and your topics are known only to you.  You are a sad flamer.  Or as Brad likes to call your type - toxic blogger.

Charles - looking at her latest articles it is apparent she is just a new version of a points whore.  I doubt she believes any of the crap she writes (she has already contradicted herself from a previous article to one of her recent ones), she just wants to get responses.  As she cannot understand what a topic is and how it flows, she just tosses a bomb on the forums and lets the stench stir up some comments for her articles.

Wrong again.  When no one can have a normal conversation with YOU, the person you should be looking at is in the mirror.

CharlesCS/Dr Guy - Blah, blah, blah ... can you two do anything besides blow each other ... other’s horn. Sounds like a Love Story to me, hehehe.

Wow, if this is the best you got, I think my job is done with you. The real you has finally been revealed. Lame, lousy and lacking of any real discussion abilities.

Yea right ... want to bet smarty pants?

Actually, we are not blowing anyone's horns, but you know what they say about paranoia.  Still, if one person sees an idiot, does that mean that everyone else must ignore the idiot because he has already been identified?

My observations are my own, thank you.  Not talking points from "Black Helicopters are after me! . org"

I see ... along with all the facts you are so want to not use. I just fail to see how anyone can present their arguments with terms like idiots and point whore and well... you are not looking for discourse, you are looking you someone to discourse on... and I just do not do well with people who like to throw shit and pretend they are factual and produce nothing but rhetoric ... not well at all.

Analogies are best made using accurate terms.  However, the arguments have been made.  The facts presented.    You just chose to ignore them.  Once YOU make that decision, there is no more debate or argument.  That you cannot read or comprehend what you read is your problem.  But I will tell you a very bad problem you have that all can see - you project your own impotence on others.

Case in point to the comment above.  I make my statements and back them up with facts,  You have yet to back up your hysteria with any facts.  And the points whore?  Glad to see you figured that one out Little Whip.  Your latest by the headline alone contradicts a comment you made in an earlier blog.  So you were either lying then, or just simply a points whore now.  Which one is your choice. So which is it?  A liar or a whore?

Doc, This article contains just about as many facts as well ... as all your comments do ... ZIP!

Yes, I guess we are all computers and always speak facts and never speak opinions.  But you are wrong again.  WHile most of the article is opinion, there are several very salient facts listed throughout.  You just do not know the difference.

If there are any facts liusted above, you sure have hidden them from me ... would you care to site one or two perhaps? So I repeat ..."Doc, This article contains just about as many facts as well ... as all your comments do ... ZIP!" It is always I cannot prove anything and you don't have to, go figure?

Fact:

"You simply need to uncheck the “Allow users to comment” box as seen above and the result is a msg on the article that states “This article has been locked and is not accepting comments” as seen on my article here so that way you can keep those pesky, annoying, ignorant members of Joeuser.com from contradicting your opinions."

Fact:

"just keep in mind if you don’t uncheck that box, expect to have you opinions questioned, dissected and debated, which is what I thought was the point of Joeuser blogs anyways"

Care to tell me how neither one of these is a fact?

No - Fact, the spelling is mostly correct. Fact, there is much name calling above. Fact, there are many claims about facts, but there aren't any real facts. Fact, there is little if any intelligence for this whole whiney article. How about getting serious for a change?

LOL, figured you couldn't answer the question without insulting someone. Fact, no one gives a dam about your spell check abilities. Fact, you are the queen of name calling and insults. Fact, you are too stupid to see facts or accept them when they contradict you opinions. Fact, there seems to be more intelligence on this article alone than most of yours. Hows about you grow up and respond like an adult for a change? Only children get annoyed about silly things like this, you get annoyed about things waaay to easily.